As I see it, there are two main schools of Cosmist
thought, which I like to call “Light Cosmism” and “Dark Cosmism” (aka "Cosmicism"). To better understand
these schools, I offer the stirring words of four great cosmic thinkers who capture the
spirit of each side: Carl Sagan and Marshall Savage vs. H.P. Lovecraft and
Friedrich Nietzsche:
“We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of
infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each
straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day
the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such
terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we
shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace
and safety of a new dark age." –H.P Lovecraft, The Call of Cthulhu
“The size and age of the Cosmos are beyond ordinary human understanding. Lost somewhere between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home, the Earth. In a cosmic perspective, most human concerns seem insignificant, even petty. And yet our species is young and curious and brave and shows much promise. In the last few millennia we have made the most astonishing and unexpected discoveries about the Cosmos and our place within it, explorations that are exhilarating to consider. They remind us that humans have evolved to wonder, that understanding is a joy, that knowledge is prerequisite to survival. I believe our future depends powerfully on how well we understand this Cosmos in which we float like a mote of dust in the morning sky.” –Carl Sagan, Cosmos
“In some remote
corner of the universe, poured out and glittering in innumerable solar systems,
there once was a star on which clever animals invented knowledge. That
was the highest and most mendacious minute of "world history" — yet
only a minute. After nature had drawn a few breaths the star grew cold, and the
clever animals had to die. One might
invent such a fable and still not have illustrated sufficiently how wretched,
how shadowy and flighty, how aimless and arbitrary, the human intellect appears
in nature. There have been eternities when it did not exist; and when it is
done for again, nothing will have happened.” –Friedrich Nietzsche, On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense
“The human race will disappear. Other races will appear and
disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble
light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear.
And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary
particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure ‘Victorian fictions’. Only
egotism
exists.” –H. P. Lovecraft
So there you have the two Cosmist schools in a
nutshell: The universe is a black sea of infinity in which science is suicide, life is futile and only egotism exists, or it's an inviting cosmic ocean where science is the key to
boundless life and progress. I find them both incredibly poetic and compelling,
and have difficulty choosing sides. What say you?
First, say I, I know you like dark and all that, but white on black text is a REAL PAIN to read. Can you maybe provide an option to get readable text at the expense of cosmic ambience?
ReplyDeleteSecond, say I, why do we have to submit to either of these schools? What if they both seem overblown, can we pick an intermediate view that still has recognizable "cosmist" pedigree?
Lovecraft, I think, is a scare monger. Sagan, despite his billions and billions of stars, still seems to allot to humans too central a location, and is too optimistic about human powers to understand what is going on.